Stents Help Some Erectile Dysfunction


By medpagetoday.com

Stenting blocked arteries in the pelvis may improve sexual function for certain men with erectile dysfunction that is unresponsive to medical therapy, results of a pilot trial indicated.

Internal pudendal artery stenting boosted erectile function scores by a clinically-significant degree in 84% of the 19 men followed for 12 months after the procedure, Krishna J. Rocha-Singh, MD, of the Prairie Vascular Institute at St. John's Hospital in Springfield, Ill., and colleagues found.

Moreover, blood flow through the stented vessels remained durably improved without any safety concerns, the group reported here at the Transcatheter Cardiovascualar Therapeutics meeting.

These first-in-man results from the ZEN trial are promising for the highly-selected group of men in the pilot, Rocha-Singh suggested.

However, the approach faces a multitude of challenges, he told MedPage Today.

Not only are the pelvic vessels foreign territory that "looks like a bowl of spaghetti" on angiography to most interventionalists, but the future looks dicey for further clinical trials.

The ZEN trial sponsor, Medtronic, dropped their involvement and cancelled further planned studies.

The financial return on investment for any individual stent manufacturer may not be deemed sufficient for the small population of men with vascular erectile dysfunction when clinicians could use any competitor's coronary stent for the procedure, Rocha-Singh suggested.

Fully 92% of the men screened for the trial weren't candidates for the intervention -- primarily because the vascular disease was so advanced that there was nothing to open up, Rocha-Singh pointed out.

Angiographic or penile duplex ultrasound characteristics required for inclusion criteria were 70% or more stenosis in one side or 50% or more on both sides.

The 30 men who were included were typically older (average age 60), with a substantial proportion having cardiovascular risk factors such as a history of tobacco use (70%) or coronary events (20% prior heart attack, 13% prior stroke, and 7% prior unstable angina).

Catching men earlier may be key, Rocha-Singh proposed.

"It was all about the simple fact that we get men too late," he said. "Instead of stenting men in their 60s who've had bypass or carotid endarterectomy or femoral popliteal bypass, we need to ask them the first time they get on a phosphodiesterase inhibitor and ask them on a regular basis how is it working."

Half of men develop a suboptimal response to these drugs within 3 years and the options for those men aren't great, often leading to penile implants, he pointed out.

In previously reported results from the trial, the primary endpoints showed no major adverse events at 30 days (deaths, perineal gangrene or necrosis, or perineal, penile, or anal surgery) and a 59% rate of a clinically-meaningful improvement in the gold-standard measure of erectile function.

Among the 23 patients who stayed in the trial to 6 month follow-up reported by Rocha-Singh, the rate of four-point or greater improvement in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) was 67%.

That rate was 84% at 12 months, though Rocha-Singh pointed out that the patient numbers had fallen off to just 19 of the original 30, suggesting the possibility of survival bias.

"I can't absolutely tell you that the patients didn't come back because they were happy they were having erections or if they were unhappy because they were already having penile implants," he told attendees at the session.

Absolute IIEF scores rose from a mean of 40 at baseline to 60 at 12 months.

Peak blood flow velocity in the cavernosal arteries through the penis showed improvements through 12 months, though, from a mean baseline of 16 cm/s to 32 cm/s.

No major adverse events were seen through 12 months.

While device companies haven't shown interest in further developing this indication for stents currently approved in the coronary heart disease setting, "that doesn't mean it's going to go away," Rocha-Singh noted, pointing to a research consortium that's getting organized in Europe around the procedure.

Source: http://www.medpagetoday.com/meetingcoverage/tct/35494

testogel and cialis http://cialissom.com/ cialis costi cialis online cialis inci sozluk cialis cheap where to buy cialis pills http://cialisles.com/ generic cialis oral jelly

Saturday, June 6, 2026

Phenazopyridine (Pyridium) - Uti Relief guide

Many patients do better with pyridium phenazopyridine once they understand what problem it targets and what limits safe use. That clarity reduces confusion about timing, side effects, and when to call a prescriber instead of waiting to see what happens. This treatment is used for patients seeking symptom relief from urinary urgency, burning, and discomfort during a urinary tract infection. Early patient education matters because people who understand the plan tend to follow through more reliably and ask more useful questions at each follow up visit. Background on this medicine appears at https://lucasclinic.com/uti-relief/pyridium-phenazopyridine/. Good reading reduces confusion around dosing, interactions, and monitoring needs. Patients who arrive at appointments already informed usually get more from limited consultation time. Consistency often separates smooth treatment from frustrating treatment. Correct use, early refill planning, and asking a pharmacist before adding new products all reduce the chance of setbacks that waste time and require extra visits. Follow through after prescription also matters. Refills should be planned before supply runs low, symptom notes should be brought to appointments, and any major change in routine should be mentioned early. Many problems are easier to fix when clinician hears about them in first week rather than after months of guessing. Side effects deserve honest discussion before and during treatment. Important warning signs include dark red or orange urine beyond expected discoloration, yellowing skin, stomach pain, or fever that starts or worsens. Some early effects are mild and temporary, while others require prompt clinical review. Waiting too long because a symptom seems minor or embarrassing can delay needed changes to the plan. Wider perspective on related treatment appears at https://lucasclinic.com/uti-relief/. Reviewing that context makes it easier to understand how this option compares with others in the same care area and when a switch might make sense. Strong outcomes usually come from small repeated actions: correct use, timely follow up, and fast response when the body or daily schedule changes in a way that might affect treatment.